New study finds that almost half of tattoo inks contain chemicals that can cause cancer

The study was presented to the American Chemical Society on Wednesday.

Amber Raiken
New York
Friday 26 August 2022 00:02 EDT
Comments
Related: Check Out These Electronic Tattoo Heart Rate Monitors

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

After looking at a variety of popular tattoo samples for a new study, researchers found that nearly 50 per cent of the tattoo inks contained chemicals that could cause cancer.

At a meeting of the American Chemical Society in Chicago, Illinois, on Wednesday, researchers at Binghamton University presented their study, which was led by John Swierk, who is an assistant professor of inorganic chemistry at the school.

As noted by Swierk, there are two parts of tattoo inks: a pigment and a carrier solution. The pigment is a molecular or a solid compound, while the carrier fluids transport the pigment through different layers of the skin.

The scientist explained how he and his team went on to test 56 popular inks, before discovering that half of them contained a chemical that was not included on the label.

“Every time we looked at one of the inks, we found something that gave me pause,” he told the ACS. “For example, 23 of 56 different inks analysed to date suggest an azo-containing dye is present.”

Speaking to The Daily Mail about his work, Swierk noted that azo-compounds can degenerate when exposed to a lot of bacteria or under ultraviolet light, which comes through sunlight, and become “carcinogenic”.

The chemist also acknowledged that there’s still a lot to learn about pigments and how safe they are.

“We don’t necessarily know what the pigments break down into and so that’s the real concern,” he said. “It’s possible that you might have pigments that by themselves are safe, but that photo decomposes into something of concern.”

In one sample, researchers detected ethanol, which can be used as a blood thinner, in the ink. However, it is still undetermined if that can put people’s health at risk or not.

In the second part of the study, researcher investigated the size of the particles within 16 inks that are used for tattoos. They discovered that half of those inks had particles under 100 nanometers, which is “concerning” because the particles are then small enough to  “get through the cell membrane and potentially cause harm”.

At the meeting on Wednesday, shared via The Daily Mail, Swierk spoke about the small particles in the ink and how they could cause health problems, including cancer.

“When you get down to that size regime you start to have concerns about nanoparticles penetrating cells, getting into the nucleus of cells, and doing damage and causing problems like cancer that way,” he said.

He also noted how there aren’t any types of pigments that are used specifically for tattoos.

“Big companies manufacture pigments for everything, such as paint and textiles. These same pigments are used in tattoo inks,” he added.

Earlier this year, the European Union banned the use of two pigments, blue 15:3 and green seven. The decision came after the company found that certain chemicals in the ink can cause “cancer or genetic mutations,” with the ban put in place in 27 European countries. However, the colours are still being used in the United States.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in