The word 'should' is sabotaging your goals, author claims

Stop using 'should'

Chelsea Ritschel
in New York
Saturday 30 December 2017 14:25 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

As the New Year inches closer, so do our New Year’s resolutions of healthy eating, working out, and speaking up more.

But it turns out one small word may be sabotaging our good intentions.

According to an excerpt on Well + Good from Erin Falconer’s new book, “How to Get Sh*t Done," set to be released in January, the word “should” is holding you back from fulfilling your goals.

Although should is a word that implies obligation and expectation, it actually has more in common with guilt, shame, and the “absence of decision.”

Because, while it may sound like a decision, "should" actually describes “possibility rather than reality,” according to Falconer.

For example, saying “I should eat healthy” has quite a different meaning than “I am eating healthy.”

Rather than definitively choosing to embark on a lifestyle change or accomplish a task, the word “should” allows its user to continue to consider other options - such as eating french fries for instance.

According to Falconer, “should” also implies negative feelings about the task at hand.

"Should" sets you up for failure
"Should" sets you up for failure

She said, “We rarely use should when talking about something we’re looking forward to,” which makes sense when you consider a sentence like, “I should clean my room.”

By using should, cleaning your room becomes a chore that looms over you rather than one you have definitively chosen to accomplish.

And as anyone who has put off a responsibility knows, the dread of knowing you will eventually have to get to it can be draining.

According to Falconer, this energy drain actually comes from split focus.

Focus and complete one task at a time
Focus and complete one task at a time

By using should, we are “forcing our minds to be in two places at once,” meaning we never feel fully accomplished - as our brains are still focusing on the other task that we put off.

Although saying should, to yourself or aloud, may seem like you have made a decision, it is actually the opposite because, according to Falconer, “the very fact of a should in a sentence is a red flag that you either don’t want to do that thing or don’t really intend to do it.”

So rather than continuing to guilt your mind over things you should do - just do it instead.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in