Shopping: Leos are extravagant, Pisceans love browsing

Does astrology govern your spending habits? By Sally Williams

Sally Williams
Friday 29 March 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Do you like shopping? Ever spend money to cheer yourself up or buy something you can't afford and then lie about it? Yes? You're probably a Cancer. Or so concludes a recent survey commissioned by Barclaycall, the telephone banking service for Barclays Bank. The survey on cosmic spending habits also revealed that 58 per cent of Leos hate shopping; 66 per cent of Virgos let bills pile up while wasting money on frills; Taureans are shopaholics and Leos are conscientious bill payers.

Just why does a sober company like Barclaycall and even the Abbey National (which last year published a survey on pension horoscopes as well as a booklet for its customers entitled Your Astrological Guide to a Secure Future) consult the stars? "Markets are segmented in many ways," said Gordon Heald, Managing Director of Opinion Research Business, which conducted the survey for Barclaycall. "We've had sex, age, income, religion... The old class divisions are wearing out. Star profiling could be a new way of understanding people's motivations. For example, we found that 36 per cent of Virgos worry about money. Among Sagittarians, it's 53 per cent. That's a significant difference."

This doesn't mean, Mr Heald explained, that Sagittarians will be targetted by tranquilliser companies; or that banks will discriminate against reckless Leos in favour of prudent Aquarians, but from a marketing point of view the possibilities are endless.

Yet hang on a minute - what about the fact that astrological profiles have little to do with the way people actually are? Gloria, an administrator at the Abbey National, may consider herself a typical Aries: "I love to spend my money and everyone else's"; Tina Bennett, the Abbey National's press officer may feel her department is full of typical Leos, "All tough negotiators with expensive tastes", and the Abbey National survey may hope that "Virgos are good pension planners", but the evidence to support astrology is hardly conclusive.

All that Barclaycall could establish was that the spending habits of their respondents totally contradicted astrological predictions. Reckless Leos turned out to be sound financial managers; meticulous Virgos liked to splurge on extravagances, and so on.

"Traditional astrological profiles" states Barclaycall "have little correlation to the way people actually manage their finances". But does this trouble Gordon Rankin, Director of Personal Banking, Barclaycall? "Not at all. The horoscope angle was just a bit of fun. A way of getting people to answer questions and to present information."

Dipping into the world of glossy astrology, there's a stiff reaction to all this. "There's a lot of dodgyness around," said Elle magazine's astrologer, Bernard Fitzwalter, darkly, when asked if he thought such stunts cheapened his profession. "Astrology has become so entrenched in the lower end of the social pyramid, high astrology has suffered." He took the Barclaycall survey as a case in point. "Of course it was inconclusive, they just used the date of birth", he said, irritation mounting. "They thought that if they took 6,000 Arian shoppers, they would all be busy buying sports equipment. Any fool could see that wouldn't be true. Now, if they had taken 6,000 people all of whom had Mars rising at the time they were born, that really would mean something."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in