Prince Harry ‘doesn’t feel safe in the UK’ as royal takes fight for police protection to High Court
The first hearing in the case took place at the Royal Courts of Justice in London on Friday
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Prince Harry doesn’t feel safe when he’s in the UK after losing police protection, the High Court has heard.
Harry is bringing a claim over Priti Patel’s decision not to allow him to pay for police protection for himself and his family while in the UK.
The Duke of Sussex’s family lost their taxpayer-funded police protection as a result of quitting their positions as senior working royals in the early part of 2020.
The UK “is and always will be, his home”, the prince’s lawyers said, adding that the duke wants to bring his children to visit from the US, but he and his family are “unable to return to his home” because it is too dangerous.
He is arguing that his private protection team in the US does not have adequate jurisdiction abroad or access to the UK intelligence information needed to keep his family safe.
The first hearing in the case took place on Friday at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, which Harry did not attend.
At the preliminary hearing, the court heard an application by both sides for some parts of the court documents in the case to be kept private.
Introducing the case, Shaheed Fatima QC, for the duke, said: “This claim is about the fact that the claimant does not feel safe when he is in the UK given the security arrangements applied to him in June 2021 and will continue to be applied to him.”
She continued: “It goes without saying that he does want to come back to see family and friends and to continue to support the charities that are so close to his heart.
“Most of all, this is and always will be, his home.”
The duke briefly returned from Los Angeles last year for the 1 July unveiling of the Diana, Princess of Wales memorial statue and, the day before, on 30 June, he met seriously ill children and young people at a WellChild garden party and afternoon tea in Kew Gardens, west London.
It is understood the duke’s car was chased by photographers as he left.
Friday’s hearing is expected to last around two hours, with part of the proceedings held in private.
Harry’s bid for a review of the Home Office decision was filed in September and has not yet been granted or denied permission for a full hearing.
The duke has previously said he “inherited” a risk on being born into the royal family.
Harry and his wife, Meghan, now live in the United States with their children Archie and Lilibet.
The couple lost their taxpayer-funded police protection after they quit as senior working royals in early 2020.
They were later forced to disclose they had put in place “privately funded security arrangements” for their move to the US, after then president Donald Trump said his country would not pay for their protection.
The hearing in front of Mr Justice Swift continues.
Additional reporting by PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments