Meghan Markle settles privacy claim over paparazzi images of son Archie
High Court hears details of settlement with agency that photographed Duchess and son Archie on ‘private’ walk
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have settled a privacy claim with a celebrity picture agency over images taken of Megan Markle on a walk with son Archie and her dogs in January.
The couple, who moved to Canada in January 2020 before settling in California, sued Splash News and Picture Agency after pictures were taken of Markle walking with her young son, now one, in a baby sling near their Canadian home.
At the High Court on Friday, the Duchess’ lawyer Jenny Afia said the case has been settled after the picture agency’s UK branch, Splash UK, had gone into administration.
Splash UK also agreed that, if they were to come out of administration, they would not target the Sussex family again in future.
A statement read to the court said: “The administrators of Splash UK have undertaken that, should the entity come out of administration, Splash UK will not take any photographs of the Duke and Duchess or their son in the future.”
The disputed images, which were syndicated to British newspapers, were taken on Vancouver Island with a long lens camera as Markle took a walk near to the £10 million mansion where she was living with Prince Harry.
Afia also noted that the day before the pictures were taken, a Splash UK photographer had undertaken “a full reconnaissance inspection of the Duke and Duchess’s private home, walking around it looking to identify entry and exit points and putting his camera over the fence to take photographs”
The Duke and Duchess sued for breach of privacy and data protection infringement, stating that capturing a “private family outing in a remote rural setting” had no public interest.
A representative for Splash UK agreed to the terms of the settlement at today’s hearing, which was conducted virtually.
A spokesman for Schillings, the duke and duchess’s legal representation, said: “As explained in today’s hearing, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have successfully settled a legal claim brought at the beginning of this year against the paparazzi agency Splash UK.
“This settlement is a clear signal that unlawful, invasive and intrusive paparazzi behaviour will not be tolerated and that the couple takes these matters seriously – just as any family would."
Markle is also locked in another High Court battle with Associated Newspapers over the publication of a letter to her father, Thomas Markle. This case is due to be tried next year.
While the Duke and Duchess have recently announced their new podcast series, Archewell Audio, which will drop on Spotify later this month.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments