Piazza plan is appalling
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Plans for a huge traffic-free piazza in front of Buckingham Palace were dismissed yesterday as 'fundamentally ill-conceived'.
The chairman of the Royal Fine Art Commission, Lord St John of Fawsley, said the scheme - aimed at improving the palace as a tourist attraction - was 'appropriate to Paris, possibly, but not to London'.
He said the commission was 'appalled' by the plan, which he claimed destroyed the in-tegrity of St James's Park.
'It threatens the peace, security and setting of one of our great national treasures, Buckingham Palace, and its royal inhabitants.
'Any pedestrian area should be strictly limited in size so that it does not attract large crowds with all the consequent disadvantage of noise, litter and other urban menaces.'
The remarks put the commission at loggerheads with another Government advisory body, the Royal Parks Review Group, which put forward the proposals in April.
It published a report condemning the setting of Buckingham Palace as a 'national disgrace' and calling for the pedestrian precinct as well as a ban on car parking in Horse Guards Parade in the Mall.
A royal parks spokesman said the scheme had since been revised. He could not give details, but said: 'It reduces the size of the pedestrian area considerably. Whether it fully addresses the concerns of the commission I cannot say.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments