Outtakes: Storm Thorgerson, designer, on Pink Floyd's 'Back catalogue'.

Scott Hughes
Friday 10 October 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The design for this picture has various Pink Floyd album covers painted on the backs of a row of young women. It came about when we were commissioned to advertise the back catalogue of Pink Floyd in 1996. There's an incredible sense of humour in the Floyd camp, and they decided that the back catalogue should be literally "the catalogue on the backs".

It actually stems from one of five ideas in a pitch by my studio, Hipgnosis, to Pink Floyd's record company, EMI, to do a TV commercial. The actual TV ad they made was called Art Gallery, and featured people in an art gallery speaking in completely incomprehensible languages - Icelandic, Hindi, Japanese - about Floyd covers hung on the wall. The "backs" idea was intended to be a TV commercial, too, but EMI decided they liked this in addition to Art Gallery. So they commissioned me to photograph it, for a promotional poster.

It was difficult to know how to use the album cover images again. You can't distort them too much, or they become unrecognisable. The "backs" idea seemed to be a nice way to re-present the images in a slightly different context, but still relatively clearly.

It took us forever to paint the girls: they had to be still for five or six hours while their backs were painted by the very expert Phyllis Cohen. From left to right, the albums are: 'Atom Heart Mother', 'Relics', 'Dark Side of the Moon', 'Wish You Were Here', 'The Wall' and 'Animals'. The co-designer was Finlay Cowan, and the photographer was Tony May.

The covers were originally going to be painted on the backs of boys and girls, but that presented us with a problem, because each back is representing an album cover, and album covers are all the same size and shape. We needed uniformity, and girls and boys' backs are obviously quite different. We had to choose one or the other, and we chose girls - probably because we're boys. It is a questionable thing on a PC level, and the photo has received some critical observations - most particularly by my partner. But most women I've shown it to don't mind it. I just think that girls backs are more elegant than men's backs, and I was going for elegance and shape here.

I think it's also very nice in that it's a photo of a group of people chatting. It's as if they're having a poolside chat, as they prepare to swim. Scott Hughes

'Mind over Matter: the Images of Pink Floyd', by Storm Thorgerson. Sanctuary Publishing, pounds 30

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in