Outtakes

Stanley Sadie, trustee of the Handel House Collections Trust, on a new acquisition

Scott Hughes
Friday 17 October 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I went to a party at Handel's house in Brook Street, London, in 1959, when it was the offices of the shirt-makers Viyella, and I thought then that I had to make it into a museum. The opportunity to do so arose when the whole site was developed by the Co-Op Insurance Society, who agreed to sell us the house as soon as the trust we set up had enough funds to carry out a refurbishment. We're now busily collecting for it. This letter, one of only very few in Georg Frideric Handel's hand, was acquired by us last month as part of a collection put together by a retired businessman, Gerard Byrne, a lifelong devotee of Handel.

Handel wrote this letter in response to a draft sent to him by Charles Jennens, a gentlemen from a noble family from the Midlands, who supervised the assemblage of the text of the Messiah. Handel would have been living in the Brook Street house at this time, and, as the coversheet shows, Jennens was living in Leicestershire.

By the time this letter was written, the Messiah had already been performed. But Jennens wasn't happy with all of Handel's music for the Messiah; he didn't feel it always did justice to the subject - which was a hell of a cheek, you might think. After all, it is for Handel's music that the Messiah is remembered, not for Jennens's words.

In the letter, Handel is acknowledging the piece which was to become the biblical drama Belshazzar. He clearly liked it, and in a further letter, owned by a collector in New York, he discusses further points about it. Handel goes on to say thank you, and that it has given him lots of ideas, but he then asks what is wrong with his music for the Messiah: "Be pleased to point out these passages in the Messiah which you think require altering." Jennens probably did tell him, but that's not in writing.

His objections may well have been related to his religio-political position. Jennens was a Nonjuror - a Protestant who refused to swear an oath of allegiance to the Hanoverians - and, as such, felt that the divine right of monarchy belonged not to the Hanoverians, but to the Catholic Stuarts. So they were in a very uneasy predicament: they believed passionately in Protestantism on one hand, but were very uneasy about its upholders on the other. This probably influenced the way he wrote certain things, but Handel was a musician above all else and was probably blissfully unaware of this. Scott Hughes

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in