On Cinema

John Lyttle
Thursday 25 August 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Everyone says Mike Nichols, the director of Wolf, is a genius. True. Only a genius could make the world believe that getting Jack Nicholson to play a

werewolf is a coup (hell, Jack Nicholson always plays a

werewolf). Only a genius could persuade James Spader to revive the yuppie slimeball stereotype that dogged his early career. And surely only a genius could waste Michelle Pfeiffer as a poor little rich girl (right), dispose of Kate Nelligan as an unfaithful wife and have Christopher Plummer do his evil bastard thing (again) and demand applause for his intelligence, restraint and taste.

Intelligence, restraint and taste are, of course, the three ingredients essential to any werewolf picture - not. But, hey, let's not get too picky. Without Nichols's genius, Wolf wouldn't be the bizarre original that it is: the first werewolf movie totally without sub-text.

A hack would have made Wolf less of a. . .

a romance? a comedy of Manhattan manners? a botch? and opted for maybe making

Nicholson's middle-aged man representative of the male who's lost his animal self. A journeyman might have even made the wolf a symbol of capitalism: ready to snarl at interlopers, ready kill to protect his territory. Someone

infinitely less intelligent and less tasteful might even have made Pfeiffer a hot babe who got off on screwing something tall, dark and hairy instead of giving her an underwritten lonely lady role to stumble through. But Nichols is above such notions - he thinks the lurking preoccupations of the horror genre banal. And who'd want to argue with him? On the subject of banality, Nichols really is a genius.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in