Off the peg: After the sarong and male nail varnish, are we ready for men in tights?

Melanie Rickey
Friday 14 August 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Men are becoming more feminine. Maybe it's the kind of thing only a woman would spot, because the men succumbing to the lure of sarongs, trendy flip-flops, moisturisers, colourless mascara, eyeliner, and nail varnish don't see their activities as anything other than normal.

Example one: I overhear a besuited business man on the tube earnestly telling his friend: "I'm just packing a few sarongs, and T-shirts." Example two: the Austrian hosiery and bodywear firm Wolford feels the time is right to launch male tights onto the market. This begs the question - has the fem/men thing gone too far? A statement from the spokeswoman for the tights' designer, Andreas Aschever-Martinelli, suggests it has: "We produced this hosiery because men all over the world want it. They said, `You are ignoring us, and we are half the population.'" She then added, "These are not girly, I think they are very manly, actually."

When Hard Candy created Candy Man nail varnishes for men in 1997, they used names such as Gigolo, Libido and Cowboy to sell the product, and it worked (well ... for Robbie Williams and Quentin Tarantino). Wolford has called its tights "Waist-socks", something of a misleading name for a pair of black opaque tights with Y-fronts sewn into the top of them. "Footed Long-Johns", would make them sound more macho, or even "ever wanted to dress like a chic version of Superman? Well, now you can." That might work. But it is unlikely, given that, at pounds 39 a pair, they are at least four times the price of the women's equivalent. It's also worth remembering that the vast majority of men hate tights on women, preferring the look, feel and (to be frank) easy access of stockings and suspenders, so why would they wear them themselves?

A reluctant, but open-minded, bloke-about-town was given a pair to try out for a couple of days, but the tights didn't last 10 minutes, despite his best intentions. "As soon as I put my jeans on over them it felt like a couple of plastic bags had been strapped to my legs," he said. After a bit of probing, though, he revealed the Y-front bit offered "lift" at the rear, and that the black "actively-breathing" cotton/Lycra fabric made his legs look like very feminine, which was a novelty for about five minutes.

His verdict: "I wouldn't wear them. I'll stick to thermals if I get cold." Tights for men may sound modern, futuristic even, but the look had its moment in the 15th century, when the Duke of Burgundy cut a dash in a black pair, worn with a doublet. And what self-respecting Nineties man wants to look like Blackadder?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in