NO-HEADLINE

LETTER

Friday 07 April 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Check it out

While appreciating your correspondent Rosalin Barker's indignation at the suggestion that she should not depend on her word-processor's spell checker (Letters, 25 March), I am concerned that anyone should credit it with the literacy she perceives as being attributable only to a "private secretary" or a "qualified typist".

It should be borne in mind that a computer can only recognise words which exist in the language. A computer is incapable of discern-ing meanings and hence cannot discriminate between "practice" and "practise", "accept" and "except", or notice typing (as opposed to spelling) mistakes, provided they still result in proper words.

While not disputing the entertainment value of my WPC's gamely offering "Masochists" in place of "Massachusetts", and similar helpful suggestions, I despaired in disgust when I discovered it was itself so flawed as to misspell "focusing" and "focuses" with two s's.

I, therefore, wholeheartedly defend your correspondent Peter Calviou, who suggested that any literate person would only regard computer spell checkers as a source of amusement. Uncertain spellers are better advised to rely on a dictionary.

brenda young

London NW7

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in