Name watching

Friday 18 July 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Camilla Parker Bowles was 50 this week and the occasion was marked by a story on the PA news wires headed: "Camilla Beats Diana in the Headline Stakes". The story claimed that in the first six months of this year, Camilla has had 6 per cent more coverage than Diana and 10 per cent more than the Spice Girls. We have checked those figures on our own newspaper database, which delves deeper than the headlines, and a rather different story emerges.

Jan-Jun '96 Jan-Jun '97

Spice Girls 1 2,696

Princess Diana 1,990 1,942

Camilla 407 527

As the above table shows, occurrences of "Camilla" have risen by more than 29 per cent in the first six months of 1997 compared with the same period last year, while the "Princess Diana" count has gone down by 2.4 per cent. If this trend is continued, Camillas will overtake Dianas around the end of 2002. Or they would, if our newspapers were not totally overtaken by references to the Spice Girls by then, which, at an annual increase of 269,500 per cent, will soon leave no room for anything else.

Clearly extrapolations based on these six-monthly figures are not to be relied upon. So here is a month-by-month breakdown from July 1996 to June 1997:

Ju Au Se Oc No De Ja Fe Ma Ap Ma Ju

Spice 26 33 26 71 127 336 277 372 626 469 529 423

Diana 529 338 337 293 306 327 389 267 263 282 307 434

Camilla 136 159 178 74 57 74 131 72 58 72 60 134

Here the figures expose the true situation. The Spice Girls clearly peaked in March and, if we extrapolate a three-monthly moving average of their scores, it becomes clear that they will probably be back to their 1996, one-mention-every-six-months level around the end of December. The current boost in Camillas is only a return to the levels of January, and appears to be a seasonal fluctuation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in