The 2 questions that 'empirically' determine if you're in love

Economists stress the importance of knowing how your partner feels

Christopher Hooton
Thursday 29 January 2015 09:30 EST
Comments
Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy in Richard Linklater's 1995 romantic drama Before Sunrise
Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy in Richard Linklater's 1995 romantic drama Before Sunrise (Columbia)

Your support helps us to tell the story

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Louise Thomas

Louise Thomas

Editor

The existence of love and its nature is something that has troubled philosophers for centuries, but a pair of scientists believe they have a set of questions that yield "clear empirical evidence" of it, or at least whether your relationship will end in divorce.

They are:

'How happy are you in your marriage relative to how happy you would be if you weren't in the marriage?' and 'How do you think your spouse answered that question?'

University of Virginia economists Leora Friedberg and Steven Stern asked this to 4,242 couples twice, six years apart, and analysing the data recently found that those who thought they would be no worse off single were more likely to now be broken up.

Only 40.9 percent of participants could accurately identify how their partner felt about their relationship, which is at the root of many relationship problems.

According to bargaining theory, misjudging your spouse's emotions can lead you to bargain 'too hard' and unwittingly precipitate a split.

"If I believe my wife is really happy in the marriage," Professor Stern explained as an example. "I might push her to do more chores or contribute a larger portion of the family income.

"If, unbeknownst to me, she's actually just lukewarm about the marriage, or she's got a really good-looking guy who is interested in her, she may decide those demands are the last straw, and decide a divorce would be a better option for her.

"In this scenario, pushing a bargain too hard, based on misperception of a partner's happiness, will result in a divorce that wouldn't otherwise have occurred."

The professors stressed the importance of picking your battles.

"This data shows that people aren't being as tough negotiators as they could be, and then we realised that we needed to include caring in the model for it to make sense," said professor Friedberg.

"The idea of love here is that you get some happiness from your spouse simply being happy.

"For instance, I might agree to do more house chores, which reduces my personal happiness somewhat, but I get some offsetting happiness simply knowing that my partner benefits."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in