Study suggests that 'gaydars' are real - at least for women
Research reveals findings about how lesbian and straight women judge each other's personality and sexual orientation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Previous studies have suggested that men's sexuality can be judged by their appearance, but a new study shows a similar experiment also works for women too.
The notion that gay people have a 'gaydar' has previously been explored in detail by researchers, but the majority of those studies have focused on men - until Mollie Ruben, a doctoral student at Northeastern University, attempted to measure a woman's ability to judge sexuality, personality and their thoughts to compare against findings for men.
She gathered a group of nine women - five of whom were lesbians - and conducted video interviews lasting five minutes, with each participant reviewing their interview and noting down their thoughts and emotions at the time.
Ms Ruben and her colleagues then asked a larger group of women - 67 straight, 43 gay - a series of questions about the video subject's sexuality, thoughts, emotions, and overall personality. Her findings, published on the Northeastern University website, were fascinating, highlighting that lesbians were effectively better at identifying other women's sexuality, with straight women commended for their ability to pinpoint emotion and personality traits.
The research suggested that lesbians found it "more interesting, motivating, and rewarding to judge the sexual orientation of other women compared to judging their thoughts, emotions, or personality". However, the reason for this, according to the study, is because straight women "might not care so much about sexual orientation and thus don't focus on it enough to detect it".
In an attempt to pre-empt criticism of their experiment, the conductors of the study admitted there were likely to be "limitations" to their study - given that the location of where they carried out their research, Boston, may not necessarily represent the same results as the rest of America or other countries.
In addition to that, participants were not drawn from random but were instead sourced from friend networks and LGBT websites, perhaps questioning the reliability of the experiment.
Nevertheless, the study has been praised for giving more insight into the idea of the "gaydar", and adds "several novel contributions to research on the subject", according to the report.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments