Woman calls out man who ‘had the audacity’ to take two work calls on first date

‘How did you not leave?’

Chelsea Ritschel
New York
Thursday 24 March 2022 10:45 EDT
Comments
Woman calls out man for answering two work calls on first date
Woman calls out man for answering two work calls on first date (TikTok / @kelceybligh)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A woman has sparked a debate about dating etiquette after calling out a first date who “had the audacity” to take two work calls.

Kelcey, who goes by the username @kelceybligh on TikTok, shared her experience in a video uploaded to the app earlier this month, in which she filmed her date discussing work while seated at their table.

“On a first date, this man had the audacity to take not only one but TWO business calls…” Kelcey wrote in a text caption on the video, adding: “Is this a joke?”

In the video, Kelcey’s date could be heard discussing what sounded like “flooring options,” with the man speaking to a person on his phone about “luxury vinyl” that “looked nice”. “Thicker material… I think it’s really …” he said.

The video has since been viewed more than 24,000 times, with viewers also criticising the man’s behaviour, which some claimed was done in an attempt to impress Kelcey.

“1000 per cent trying to ‘impress’. The right thing to do would be to explain the importance of the call to you, apologise, then step away for a second,” one person wrote.

Another said: “I would have left,” while someone else described the man’s behaviour as “insufferable”.

However, others defended the man on the basis that the calls may have been important, with one person acknowledging that he “sounds like a contractor” and “those dudes be working all day everyday”.

“And when they’re not at work they’re on the phone talking about work,” they added.

Someone else sarcastically wrote: “Maybe it’s his job and livelihood?”

While people were divided by the man’s choice to take the work call, most agreed that the right thing to do would have been for him to excuse himself from the table if the call was important enough.

“Maybe he should have excused himself from the table but work is work,” one person wrote.

As for whether Kelcey’s date apologised for the interruptions, she said in the comments that “no explanations or apologies were made”.

According to a 2017 Singles in America study conducted by dating site Match, which analysed the dating rituals and preferences of more than 5,000 single individuals, 75 per cent said they would be turned off if a date answered a phone call, while 66 per cent said it would be a turn off if their date used their phone to send a text.

The Independent has contacted Kelcey for comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in