LETTER: The Rushdie debate is used to justify attacks on Muslims
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE REAL damage done by Salman Rushdie has not been the ridicule of a religion - few religions would be deflected or destroyed by such abuse - but the campaign by a bandwagon of his defenders seeking to attack Islam and Muslims rather than to protect Mr Rushdie ("The itch of guilt won't got away while Rushdie remains condemned", 23 July). Statements in defence of free speech have adopted a clearly anti-Islamic stance which has legitimised activities from "Paki- bashing" to "ethnic cleansing". Militant Hindus in India to nationalistic Serbians have used the Western liberal concentration on Rushdie to justify atrocities perpetrated on Muslims.
Muslims today see themselves as embattled in a world which has become less tolerant of differences in belief and deviance from a fashionable lack of belief or principle. Internationally, Muslims see examples - Chechnya and Bosnia are only the most recent - of their being denied a proper participation in political activity and nationhood in states where they are a majority. This denial appears connived at or condoned by the Western democracies. There are other priorities than the fate of Mr Rushdie, however uncomfortable that may be.
Raymond T Ham
London N10
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments