LETTER: Scapegoats over child abuse Child abuse and society
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ROSIE Waterhouse's article is a welcome contribution to an overdue evaluation of the meaning of child abuse ("So what is child abuse?", 23 July). However, she perpetuates a common mistake by using "child abuse" when she refers to sexual abuse. The well-publicised extremes of some social work practice over the last 10 years (Cleveland, Orkney) have removed attention from the physical abuse of children. The debate about what is child abuse has to include discussion of all forms of violence done by adults to children.
Parents Against Injustice suggests in the article that "social workers need to be more aware of the realities of normal family life". Does PAI suppose that social workers have had no normal lives as children and that we do not have children of our own?
Perhaps it would be more appropriate to ask whether, in a time of decreasing public morality, social work has unwittingly (and unfairly) been set up as the conscience and the scapegoat of an uncaring society. For the official maltreatment of children we need look no further than the proposals for child prisons and the withdrawal of benefit for teenagers. No one profession can ensure the safety and well-being of our children - particularly when there is no agreement on what this safety and well-being might mean in practice.
Gary Clapton, Maggie Mellor
Edinburgh
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments