Letter: Marx didn't want to explain society, he wanted to change it
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.John Cassidy's redefinition of Marx as a "student of capitalism" is wide of the mark ("The next big thinker", Review, 7 December). Marx didn't write Capital to satisfy intellectual curiosity. He did so out of a recognition that once capitalism had passed its early dynamic phase it would throw up constraints on human development. Modern thinkers who adopt Marx do so because they want to understand the dynamics of capitalist society and that is generally where their interest ends. In this age of low horizons, radical social change brought about by conscious action is off the agenda, and in this climate Marx can seem unthreatening. However, Marx wasn't interested in just understanding society, in his words "the point is to change it".
David Amis
Stanford le Hope, Essex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments