Letter: Brixton: the part played by police in a protest-turned- riot
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Joseph Smith
Sir: One can see from the tenor of discussions following Wednesday's tragic protest-turned-riot that peace will not be forthcoming.
Attention remains focused on members of the black community, who are held fully responsible for the riot. However, criminalising black anger is not a good way to begin a constructive dialogue.
Authorities seeking a rationale for the anger that sparked the riot should stop pointing fingers. For instance, why isn't the death in custody of Wayne Douglas included as an incitement? In the aftermath of that tragic death, a more reasonable authority might have suggested a lower police profile on Wednesday.
Deploying large numbers of police in full riot gear is definitely an incitement. Isn't that a sign that the police are itching for a confrontation? Your timeline ("Angry words that ignited the tinder-box", 15 December) shows that trouble erupted after police in full riot gear tried to block protesters from disrupting traffic. Unfortunately, someone decided that a sit-down demonstration was too much to tolerate. That decision ended with a full-scale riot.
Sir Paul Condon's remarks about a "criminal element" don't play too well, as he is on record as viewing the whole black community as inclined towards crime. Why hasn't he resigned?
Focus remains on the strong words of Rudy Narayan as the key to the riots. He offers an obvious target. However, the actions that followed his strong words were a march and a sit-down demo. It took police action to turn the situation into something bigger. What harm would have come from letting the protesters express their anger, even if that meant several hours of noisy chanting and blocking traffic? With no resistance from police, the marchers would have gradually grown tired and dispersed.
Peace will come to communities like Brixton only when the grievances of the black community are given serious attention. Everything about the handling of Wednesday night's demo shows that we have a long way to go in this regard.
Yours faithfully,
Joseph Smith
London, W4
15 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments