Influencers hawking $98 pajamas ‘for everybody’ slammed as out of touch

Cecily and Samantha Bauchmann quickly lowered their prices after facing criticism online

Kaleigh Werner
New York
Wednesday 13 November 2024 16:45 EST
Comments
Influencers are called ‘out of touch’ for high-priced pajama brand
Influencers are called ‘out of touch’ for high-priced pajama brand (TikTok/@cecilybauchmann)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Influencers Cecily and Samantha Bauchmann are facing backlash for releasing a new line of holiday-inspired pajamas that were originally priced at $98 a set.

Cecily – a mom of four who rose to fame on social media for posting family-friendly videos of her day-to-day as a parent –partnered with her sister-in-law and best friend Samantha – a fellow creator known for her food content – to launch a new line of “high-end” nightwear called “4 The Mems.” However, fans are coming down on the business owners, calling them “out of touch” for claiming their pajamas were “for everyone” when they cost close to $100.

The two social media stars have been rolling out their new company for weeks, posting videos wearing the different sets with Christmas and winter-themed prints. On November 11, the 4 The Mems website officially went live with pajama options for adults, children, toddlers, and babies.

“IT’S TIIIIIIIIIIIIME. In your best Mariah Carey voice!!! @shop4themems is LIVE! Head to the link in our bios to shop,” Samantha and Cecily’s joint Instagram caption read.

According to the website, baby jumpers are $38, children’s sets are $58, and adult sets are now $75 – but they were originally more. Following the pajama release, frustrated shoppers filled Cecily and Samantha’s comments sections with angry messages after noticing the prices.

“Cecily and Samantha Bauchmann just launched a pajama store online. They are selling $98 pajamas that are apparently ‘for everybody,’” one Reddit user explained next to a screenshot of the critics bashing the duo. “People are realizing how out of touch they are.”

One of the slogans on the website reads: “For every body, for every memory.”

One commenter added: “$500 for my family to match. That’s half my mortgage for the month. INSANE.”

“I was so excited to see these and they are adorable but I don’t have the budget for this and I think most everyday Americans are in the same boat,” wrote another.

The Independent has contacted the Bauchmanns for comment.

Amid the criticisms, Cecily and Samantha took to TikTok to explain that they had initially priced their clothing high because they were building their brand “from the ground up,” meaning they were putting their own investment and time into it.

The partners started their video, which has now amassed over 3.2 million views, by admitting the point of their brand was to bring “high quality” garment options for everyone “to love.”

“Obviously, neither of us have had any experience in the clothing industry,” Samantha admitted before Cecily noted: “When it comes to building a clothing line from the ground up, it is completely different.

“In all honesty, yesterday was another learning opportunity for us,” Cecily continued.

Samantha went on to say they were “thankful” for all the feedback they received on the pricing and in an effort to make their clothing more “accessible”, they were lowering the prices.

“We saw your guys’ comments about being so excited for this drop, and we are so grateful for you being a part of the excitement with us,” Cecily said. “But then, your disappointment about not being able to have it within reach, and that’s why we wanted to reduce those prices.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in