Older siblings have higher IQs… but only just
Huge study suggests first-borns are that little bit smarter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sibling rivalry can be a scourge for many families.
But now new research has poured fuel on the fire by revealing that older siblings have higher IQs.
However, whilst first-borns are technically smarter - they aren’t ahead by much. The study found that whilst older siblings have higher IQs, it is only by one IQ point.
The research by academics at the University of Illinois studied 377,000 high school students to analyse how family chronology affects peoples’ lives.
The results were published in the Journal of Research in Personality.
The study also revealed that first-borns tend to be more outgoing, agreeable and conscientious. They are also less likely to experience anxiety than their younger siblings.
The university say that the study is “the biggest in history looking at birth order and personality.”
However, for anyone jealous that an older sibling might have an unfair advantage in life, they are quick to reassure that the finding is so small as to make little or no impact on families.
Professor Brent Roberts and Rodica Damian who led the research, said that “the difference is statistically significant but meaningless” and that the one IQ point would “have no practical relevance to people’s lives.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments