Menu labeling laws in US restaurants yield small results: study

Relaxnews
Friday 29 July 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments
(AFP PHOTO/Don EMMERT)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A new report studying the impact food labeling laws have made on consumer choices in the US has found that one in six customers used the nutritional information to choose items with lower calories.

Since New York made it mandatory for restaurant chains to provide nutritional information on menu boards, consumers have been making small but positive choices, researchers said. The law, which applied to chains that have more than 15 locations nationwide, was enacted in 2008.

The report, published on the British Medical Journal website this week, was written to help guide urban planners in England, where certain high streets will likewise embark on a similar scheme. Participation, however, would be voluntary.

Since the new labeling laws went into effect, 15 percent of customers reported using the calorie information to influence their food choice. On average, these customers purchased foods with 106 fewer calories than those who didn't use the nutritional labeling.

Researchers also found that three major fast-food chains saw significant reductions in calories purchased.

The average energy or calories per purchase among consumers at McDonald's, for instance, dropped by 5 percent. At Au Bon Pain the average number of calories fell by 14 percent, and at KFC it fell by 6 percent.

Subway, meanwhile, saw a significant increase in the number of calories purchased - 18 percent - because large portions were being heavily promoted, researchers said.

Surveys were carried out in 2007 - one year before the regulation - and in the spring of 2009 after the implementation of the law.

A total of 15,800 customers provided registered receipts from 11 top fast-food chains.

Meanwhile, a recent study published this month in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that some restaurants were mislabeling food items, knocking about 100 calories off the real calorie content. Researchers from Tufts University found that 19 percent of the 269 food items sampled contained more calories than stated.

http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d4464

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in