Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Male doctors are four times more likely to be disciplined for misconduct than female medics, according to a new Australian study which found the biggest cause of complaint was sexual misbehaviour.
Researchers at the University of Melbourne analysed 485 cases where doctors had been found guilty of misconduct and disciplined in Australia and New Zealand between 2000 and 2009.
They found that overall about six in every 10,000 doctors were disciplined in Australia and New Zealand each year by a tribunal with the power to deregister them, with male medics making up the overwhelming majority of cases.
When the figures were adjusted to take into account that there are fewer female doctors and they work fewer hours on average, male doctors were found to be four times more likely to be disciplined than their female counterparts.
Obstetrician-gynaecologists and psychiatrists had the highest rate of disciplinary action, followed by general practitioners, the study published in the Medical Journal of Australia showed.
Doctors were most commonly cited for sexual misconduct (24 percent), followed by unethical or illegal prescribing (21 percent). Eight percent of cases related to the death of a patient.
Lead researcher Katie Elkin, from Melbourne's School of Population Health and Law School, said she had been surprised at the gender difference.
She said in the majority of cases, the patient suffered no physical or diagnosed psychiatric harm.
"These findings indicate that boards and tribunals interpret their public protection role fairly broadly," Elkin said.
"They were often prepared to sanction doctors irrespective of whether or not the misconduct had resulted in harm to a patient. What this suggests is that regulators are not sitting back - they are trying to be proactive when professional misconduct poses risks to the community."
mfc/ft
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments