Average lunch break lasts only 22 minutes, report finds

Nearly one fifth of workers don't leave their desks during lunchtime

Olivia Petter
Sunday 21 October 2018 09:56 EDT
Comments
(Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Long gone are the days when employees would sidle out of the office at 12 noon for a lunchtime meeting only to trundle back three hours later, two courses and a bottle of Chardonnay down.

Today, high demands and an increasingly volatile economic landscape have rendered the concept of lunch hours obsolete in most offices, with the average Brit now taking just 22 minutes for their midday break, new research claims.

Lunchtimes have fallen by a third in the last six years, with a 2012 average of 33 minutes, according to a poll of more than 800 workers conducted by hospitality company Sodexo and nonprofit health body Ukactive,

The survey found that one in five employees didn’t leave their desks at all during lunchtime.

The research, as reported by The Daily Telegraph, also looked into how much British workers were exercising and found that one in five cycled or walked to work, with the majority travelling by train or car.

Meanwhile, at lunchtime - once viewed as the optimum time to squeeze in a workout - today’s employees are mostly sedentary, the report claims.

Three quarters of people aren’t physically active on their lunch breaks, which makes sense given the 22-minute average barely warrants enough time to grab a ham and cheese sandwich from Pret A Manger, let alone start breaking a sweat on a cross trainer.

Among reasons cited for skipping the break, most people gave work-related explanations, such as excessive workload or unprecedented task lists.

Others said there simply weren’t enough dining options nearby, leaving them to resort to desk-side meals they would've presumably brought in from home or purchased from a supermarket.

“These figures are a shocking indictment of modern workplace cultures, where employees increasingly find themselves tied to their desks and screens all day,” comments Steven Ward, chief executive at Ukactive.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

“Our research shows staff believe in the benefits of being more physically active but don’t feel they have the time - employers should heed these warnings if they want to encourage their teams to be more productive.”

It's not just Brits who have waved goodbye to the luxury of lunch hours; lunchtime is a similarly short-lived affair across the pond, with a 2015 survey finding that just one fifth of Americans spend their lunch break away from their desks.

There’s increasing evidence to show the adverse effects of spending an entire day sat down at a desk.

While there’s no set time limit advising people how long they should or shouldn’t sit for, research has linked excessive sitting to obesity, type 2 diabetes and some forms of cancer.

If you really can’t manage prolonged periods of time away from your desk, recent guidelines published by the UK's four Chief Medical Officers recommend taking shorter breaks at regular intervals throughout the day lasting for one or two minutes.

Something really is better than nothing, at least in this instance.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in