Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A global wireless industry group Tuesday disputed the significance of a report released by a UN health organization citing a potential cancer link from use of mobile phones.
CTIA-The Wireless Association said the UN agency "conducts numerous reviews and in the past has given the same score to, for example, pickled vegetables and coffee."
This classification "does not mean cell phones cause cancer," the industry association said in a statement, noting that "limited evidence from statistical studies can be found even though bias and other data flaws may be the basis for the results."
The reaction came after the World Health Organization's cancer research agency said the use of cell phones and other wireless communication devices are "possibly carcinogenic to humans."
The radio frequency electromagnetic fields generated by such devices were deemed as potential cancer agents "based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer," the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) said in a statement.
A group of experts meeting in the French city of Lyon over the past eight days "reached this classification based on its review of the human evidence coming from epidemiological studies," said Jonathan Samet, president of the work group.
The wireless association said the IARC working group "did not conduct any new research, but rather reviewed published studies."
It also noted that the US Federal Communications Commission "has concluded that 'there's no scientific evidence that proves that wireless phone usage can lead to cancer'" and that the US Food and Drug Administration has also stated that "'the weight of scientific evidence has not linked cell phones with any health problems.'"
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments