How much exercise do you need to do to lose weight?

The study contradicts NHS guidelines for adults

Arjun Neil
Monday 11 July 2016 14:47 EDT
Comments
Joining a society can be a good way of meeting new people outside (and often inside) the pub
Joining a society can be a good way of meeting new people outside (and often inside) the pub (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The most significant health benefits come from minimal exercise - with more strenuous regimes providing fewer or no gains, a study has found.

In an article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Dr Thijs Eijsvogels and Dr Paul Thompson compared the effects of varying amounts of moderate (cycling or fast-walking) and vigorous exercise (running or rowing) on cardiovascular disease and mortality rates.

The ‘lowest effective dose' - the smallest amount of exercise that can yield health benefits - was found to be 15 minutes of moderate exercise daily, amounting to 105 minutes weekly.

These claims contradict the NHS guidelines for adults, which recommend 150 minutes of moderate activity per week.

The difference was equally stark for vigorous activity, where the studies pointed to between 35 and 70 minutes weekly as optimal, against the recommended 75 by the NHS and Harvard University.

The JAMA article also cast doubt on the additional benefits of higher levels of exercise, with its research pointing to a tapering off and even a decrease in cardiovascular health and life-expectancy.

A Copenhagen City heart study was used to suggest that while moderate increases in the amount of exercise did result in mortality benefits, physical activity beyond a certain point, seen here to be more than 240 minutes per week, yielded no additional health advantages.

However, the existence of an upper limit to exercise benefits will be irrelevant to many Brits, 40% of whom admitted to doing no moderate exercise at all in a 2015 study by the British Heart Foundation, confirming what some have labelled an "inactivity pandemic".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in