Women 'put under pressure for IVF treatment'

Health Editor,Jeremy Laurance
Tuesday 07 November 2000 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Too many infertile women are being pressurised to have the "blunderbuss" treatment of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) rather than simpler and cheaper surgery which could allow them to conceive naturally, the fertility pioneer, Lord Winston, said yesterday.

Too many infertile women are being pressurised to have the "blunderbuss" treatment of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) rather than simpler and cheaper surgery which could allow them to conceive naturally, the fertility pioneer, Lord Winston, said yesterday.

Women were having IVF because it was the only treatment on offer from fertility clinics which lacked the skills to carry out the surgery they needed, said the Labour peer, who is professor of fertility studies at Hammersmith hospital.

Lord Winston, who wasspeaking at the Millennium Festival of Medicine in London, called for a more "holistic" approach to the treatment of infertility. "We have to look very carefully at the overall picture. We should try to restore fertility first instead of immediately using the blunderbuss which IVF still sadly is," he said.

Over the past six years, he said he had operated on 76 women who had previously had IVF treatments, using surgery to unblock Fallopian tubes and restore fertility, 42 of whom had gone on to conceive naturally. Some of the women had had five or six attempts at IVF.

"These women were pressurised into IVF when a natural conception in the bed would have been possible," he said.

Lord Winston said: "IVF is being offered because it is the simplest treatment for clinics to offer, because they don't have expertise in tubal surgery. Yet surgery is cheaper than IVF, offers restoration of fertility and does not carry the risk of a multiple birth."

He said surgery was not suitable for all women with blocked tubes but there were a large number for whom it was "a much better option" than IVF.

Lord Winston also attacked the fertility clinic league tables giving success rates for IVF clinics as "fundamentally flawed and useless". Clinics were "doctoring" the figures,turning away older women because of fears that they would depress the success rates.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in