Wakefield unlikely to be charged over MMR scare
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Andrew Wakefield, the researcher who sparked the scare over MMR, is unlikely to face disciplinary charges after failing to reveal he worked for the Legal Aid Board six years ago, according to a senior member of the General Medical Council, (GMC).
Dr Wakefield is under investigation by the GMC for failing to declare a conflict of interest over his research which suggested that MMR vaccination might be linked with bowel disease and autism. The finding was published in The Lancet in February 1998, causing a mass boycott of the vaccine.
The editor of The Lancet, Richard Horton, said he would not have published the research had he known then that Dr Wakefield was at the time being paid for a study looking for evidence to support legal action by parents who thought their children had been damaged by the vaccine.
Dr Wakefield received £55,000 paid into his research fund by the Legal Aid Board.
The GMC receives about 3,500 complaints a year. If it finds that there is a case to answer, it can be referred to the Preliminary Proceedings Committee, which could opt for a full public hearing.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments