Veto of NHS report angers Information Commissioner Christopher Graham

 

Wednesday 16 May 2012 06:10 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Blocking the publication of a document on the risks of NHS reforms is a sign that ministers want to downgrade Freedom of Information laws, a watchdog has warned.

The Information Commissioner, Christopher Graham, criticised the Government's decision to exercise its veto, in a report on the case to Parliament.

Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, vetoed an Information Tribunal ruling that he should meet Labour demands to publish the Transition Risk Register, which sets out internal government assessments of the dangers posed by the reforms in the Health and Social Care Act.

Mr Graham dismissed Mr Lansley's argument that there were exceptional circumstances and that it involved a matter of principle, saying that the decision "marks a significant step in the Government's approach to freedom of information".

The Department of Health stood by its assertion, saying the Freedom of Information Act "was drafted specifically to allow for the ministerial veto".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in