UN report condemns Britain for allowing parents to smack children

Jeremy Laurance
Friday 04 October 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Britain was condemned yesterday for continuing to permit the smacking of children, 13 years after signing the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. A UN report yesterday expressed its "deep regret" that Britain continues to tolerate the "reasonable chastisement" of children by parents.

Smacking constitutes "a serious violation of the dignity of the child" and "undermines educational measures to promote positive and non-violent discipline," the UN committee on the rights of the child said.

It called on the Government to change the law to prohibit all corporal punishment in the family, repeating the demand it made in its first highly critical report on the UK's human rights record in 1995. That report was followed in 1998 by a European Court ruling critical of UK law for failing adequately to protect the rights of the child.

The Department of Health published a consultation paper in response to the ruling but the Government announced in November last year that it was retaining the "reasonable chastisement" defence for parents, although corporal punishment is banned in schools.

John Denham, a Home Office minister, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "What we'd all want to do is to reduce smacking as much as possible, but we do that not by bringing the police or criminal law into this but by ... working with parents to show the different ways of dealing with disciplining a child, other than smacking."

He said the Government had never believed the UN convention required the UK to outlaw smacking. He denied that a parent who gave their child a "mild smack" on their hand was on the "slippery slope" to murdering their child.

Other countries, including Germany, Austria, Norway and Sweden, have banned all corporal punishment of children. The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children said smacking gave children a lesson in bad behaviour, teaching them that violence pays, and could be physically and emotionally harmful.

Mary Marsh, the chief executive, said: "The law of 'reasonable chastisement', devised in the 19th century, is well past its sell-by date. It sends a dangerous message to parents that hitting children is acceptable and safe, which it clearly is not."

The UN committee also said it remained concerned about the high rate of teenage pregnancies and noted with "deep concern" growing levels of child neglect. It said 296 children had been injured because of restraints and control in prison and urged the Government to review the use of restraint and solitary confinement.

The report also raised concern about the number of children suffering mental health problems and the high rate of suicides among young people.

It was not all bad news for the Government, with the committee praising its children's and young people's unit, the abolition of corporal punishment in schools and implementation of the Human Rights Act into UK law. The commitment to end child poverty was also welcomed, but the committee said many children were still being let down, with poor housing, homelessness, malnutrition and failures in education among its main concerns.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in