Surgeons admit failure to report scale of breast implant ruptures
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The scale of the breast implant scandal involving faulty silicone devices given to more than 40,000 British women cannot be determined because no one knows the true failure rate of the devices, leading surgeons admitted yesterday.
The lack of regulation of cosmetic surgery clinics means no reliable records of the rupture rate for breast implants exist and risks to patients cannot be assessed, experts said.
The disclosure poses a challenge for the government review of the faulty implants manufactured by the French firm Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP). The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, which approves the devices in the UK, said the failure rate was less than 1 per cent but in France the government has estimated the failure rate at 5 per cent.
One major UK cosmetic clinic chain, Transform, has told the Department of Health its rupture rate for the PIP implants was 7 per cent, over seven times higher than the official figure.
The British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons demanded yesterday that every breast implant be recorded on a national register and manufacturers made subject to random checks. Nigel Mercer, former president of the association, said: "When the MHRA quoted a 1 per cent failure rate we asked ourselves, where did they get that from?"
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments