Surgeon wins damages at race tribunal

Health Editor,Jeremy Laurance
Tuesday 11 September 2001 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A hospital consultant has won damages and a pay rise from an NHS trust after a case that an employment tribunal said was in "the worst category of racial discrimination".

Dr Mohamed Nasr, the head of genito-urinary medicine at Salisbury Health Care NHS Trust, was awarded £18,000 exemplary damages, and a £2,645 pay rise backdated to April 1999. Dr Nasr, head of GU medicine at the trust for 18 years, was repeatedly passed over for discretionary pay rises while others were awarded them. At a hearing in September last year, the trust was found guilty of racial discrimination. Despite this, it made no apology and refused to accept blame.

In August this year, a remedies hearing of the tribunal ordered the trust to pay damages and back pay to Dr Nasr. The tribunal said that "not a word of sympathy or contrition" was offered to Dr Nasr after the finding of racial discrimination and that he had been "humiliated in a very public way". It ruled that the trust had failed to demonstrate a "reasonable and plausible" explanation for its failure to award Dr Nasr a discretionary pay rise.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in