Specialists seek to calm fears over comparison of HRT to thalidomide

Jeremy Laurance
Wednesday 08 October 2003 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Middle-aged women should not refuse hormone replacement therapy because of the controversy over its safety, a group of experts said yesterday.

HRT has an "important role" in the treatment of menopausal symptoms and women should be advised on the balance of risks and benefits, they said. More than 300 specialists in HRT from across Britain issued the "consensus" statement in response to what many consider ill-judged warnings about its risks.

The specialists, attending a conference organised by the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, rejected claims by the head of the German Commission on the Safety of Medicines comparing HRT to thalidomide, the drug given to pregnant women in the 1960s that caused birth defects. Bruno Muller-Oerlinghausen, professor of pharmacology at the Benjamin Franklin University in Berlin, said "More women have probably died from the consequences of hormone therapy than damaged children were born in the wake of the thalidomide scandal."

He was referring to a series of studies over the past two years that have shown HRT, taken by about 1.5 million women in Britain, doubles the risks of breast cancer and increases the risk of blood clots, strokes and heart attacks.

The largest of these studies, published in the Lancet in August, which followed more than one million women over five years from 1996 to 2001, calculated that HRT had caused 20,000 cases of breast cancer over the past decade in Britain.

Professor David Purdie, chairman of the conference and an adviser to the Department of Health on HRT, described Professor Muller-Oerlinghausen comments as "outrageous" and "insulting to the victims [of thalidomide]". He also rejected the claim that HRT had caused 20,000 cases of breast cancer in the UK as "utterly sensationalist". He said the conclusions of the million women study were being questioned by the international scientific community.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in