Scientists hail cure for most common cause of blindness
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A drug that could save thousands of people from going blind is being hailed as a "miraculous" advance against a modern epidemic. But the drug, Lucentis, has sparked a row over its cost after ophthalmologists found that it worked in a similar way to an existing drug that was equally safe and effective and sells at a fraction of the price.
An estimated 27,000 people in England and Wales develop wet macular degeneration, the commonest cause of blindness, each year. The progressive condition slowly destroys the retina, causing the loss of central vision.
Until recently there has been no treatment for macular degeneration, which affects one in three people by the age of 75 and is increasing as the population ages. The first breakthrough came with the development of photo dynamic therapy, which helps 7,000 of the 27,000 sufferers a year, and a drug, Macugen, launched last year has been shown to halve the risk of severe loss of vision.
Results from two trials of Lucentis, conducted in the United States, show it is even more effective, actually improving vision in a third of patients and halting the deterioration in most of the rest.
In an editorial headlined "A very effective treatment for neovascular macular degeneration", The New England Journal of Medicine, which publishes the findings today, says the drug is "miraculous" and the results "exciting".
But it uses identical terms to describe the rival drug, Avastin, normally used to treat cancer and not licensed for macular degeneration, and says a "head to head comparison of the two drugs is now warranted".
Such a trial would cost tens of millions of dollars and Genentech, the Californian biotech company that makes both drugs, is reluctant to fund it because it could undermine its profits.
Lucentis costs around £1,000 a dose and is given by injection directly into the eye. Patients need injections monthly for up to two years and possibly for life. It is licensed in the US and a licence is expected in the UK by the end of the year.
Avastin, licensed as a treatment for colon cancer two years ago, costs from £10 to £25 a dose when given by injection into the eye. Its use in macular degeneration was discovered by a US consultant ophthalmologist, Philip Rosenfield, chief author of the new study of Lucentis, who noticed that the two drugs worked in a similar way. He experimented on two patients and after he published his results last year, ophthalmologists around the world rapidly took up the treatment, using the drug "off licence", with the consent of patients.
Professor Rosenfield described Avastin as "truly a wonder drug" and said it showed both how good drug companies were "and, on the flip side, how greedy they are". He called for governments to fund clinical trials in the public interest.
Steve Winyard, policy director of the Royal National Institute for the Blind, said Lucentis was "very good news" for patients and a "significant further step forward". Trials to test Lucentis against Avastin were now necessary and should be funded by the Government.
"It could be a very good spend-to-save measure [to run a government-funded trial]. If the drug companies don't want to do it maybe the NHS should."
Winfried Amoaku, consultant ophthalmologist at Queen's Medical Centre in Nottingham and deputy chairman of the scientific committee of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists said: "[Lucentis] is expensive but you can't put a price on vision. If you lose your sight you lose your independence and the care you need ends up costing more."
Macular degeneration and its possible treatments
Macular degeneration affects an estimated 500,000 people in the UK.
The macula is at the centre of the retina, where the light is focused, and is essential for reading, writing and seeing colour.
In affected individuals, the delicate cells at the centre of the macula stop working for reasons that are not understood.
Most cases are of the slow progressing, dry kind for which there is no treatment.
Wet macular degeneration, which progresses faster, affects 27,000 new patients each year.
Most of these patients can now be helped by laser treatment, photodynamic therapy or drugs.
Most patients have to pay privately for drug treatment because the National Institute for Clinical Excellence is not due to issue guidance on their NHS use until autumn 2007.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments