PRIVATE HEALTH A SPECIAL REPORT: Elderly seek comfort with cover for some good old days

Mike Truman
Wednesday 29 March 1995 17:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BY MIKE TRUMAN

Extending tax relief to private medical insurance taken out by the over- 60s was designed to help those who had been covered by their employer's private medical insurance to continue with their own cover.

However, even with the option to continue private cover offered by some employers' schemes, and with the extra tax relief introduced in 1990, the cost can be out of reach. And for those who were never in a private scheme before reaching retirement age, the number of companies willing to take them on is very limited.

Stanley Browne is managing director of Private Medicine Intermediaries, based in Knutsford, Cheshire. The company is Europe's largest independent private medical broker, formed after a management buyout from its previous parent, Cornhill Insurance.

Mr Browne cannot understand why some companies are prepared to consider such cover but others are not.

"It seems to be down to what the company's actuaries are prepared to look at," he said. "There does not seem to be any logical consistency to the decisions they make in this area."

He believes many of the policies are targeted wrongly, because they try to cover all possible costs.

"If you are even considering this sort of insurance in retirement, you clearly have a reasonable income," he says. "So you do not need cover for an hour or two of physiotherapy. You can afford to pay for that yourself. What you do need is to be covered for the major expenses involved in a hospital operation."

As well as some of the well known companies, such as Norwich Union, Mr Browne suggests that it is worth looking at the small Exeter Friendly Society. Their new plan, launched on April 1, accepts new applicants up to the age of 79. They are the only medical insurance provider who do not increase premiums for policyholders simply because they get older, they only increase because of medical inflation.

This is achieved despite a low starting price. The cost of cover for an applicant who is 60 at entry is just under £480 after tax relief, compared to more than £700 from a typical major insurer.

The society is not at present well-known, and the majority of members join on the personal recommendation of others. However, it is about to start an advertising campaign in the press, which may bring it to wider attention.

It succeeds in keeping prices down mainly by a close attention to detail. It negotiates annu- ally with hospitals to agree accommodation rates. Generally its members are limited to the lowest accomodation bands, and may sometimes have to share a room, but the society has managed to agree accommodation at these rates in most private hospitals.

They also check the bills carefully when they arrive, and take a firm view of the cost of a consultant's time if a procedure is routine they do not expect to pay an inflated bill simply because the surgeon considers himself worth it.

Despite this, the society prides itself on good claims handling, settling bills within days.

It seems that this tight approach to costs is the only way that insurers will be able to offer the elderly access to private medical insurance. Without it, it is probable that just as private medicine becomes worth having, it will become too expensive to afford.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in