Patient challenges forced electroshocks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Doctors' powers to force severely depressed patients to have eloctroconvulsive therapy (ECT) will be reviewed by a High Court judge this week.
Doctors' powers to force severely depressed patients to have eloctroconvulsive therapy (ECT) will be reviewed by a High Court judge this week.
In the first case of its kind, a woman aged 41 who has refused ECT against her doctors' advice has been granted a judicial review of their power to impose it on her.
The outcome of the case, being brought under human rights legislation, could have implications for the 10,000 patients a year who are given ECT. Doctors say it can save the lives of patients suffering suicidal depression but it is the only treatment requiring a general anaesthetic which can be administered to a patient who has mental capacity without their consent.
The woman, identified only as K, was admitted to Springfield Hospital in south-west London in January where doctors planned to administer emergency ECT. But her lawyers obtained a temporary injunction on the evening of 8 January preventing the treatment, and the next morning applied for a judicial review of the case.
Although the woman is suffering from a mental illness, it is accepted by the doctors that she has mental capacity, said her barrister, Stephen Field. "She doesn't want her head plugged into the mains and she is quite capable of giving cogent reasons for her decision.''
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments