Meadow appeals against GMC bar
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Professor Sir Roy Meadow will begin a High Court challenge tomorrow against a decision by the General Medical Council to strike him off.
The 72-year-old paediatrician was found guilty last July of serious professional misconduct over evidence he gave in the trial of Sally Clark, who was convicted but later cleared of murdering two of her babies. Sir Roy is appealing against the decision of the GMC and its punishment of removal from the medical register.
His lawyers are expected to argue at a three-day hearing in London before Mr Justice Collins that a GMC fitness to practise panel was wrong to conclude that what he did amounted to serious professional misconduct. They are also expected to contend that, in any event, removal from the register was too extreme a punishment.
The panel concluded he had "abused his position as a doctor" by giving misleading evidence in the Clark trial. It said the consequences of his errors "cannot be underestimated" and had "seriously undermined" the position of doctors giving evidence in trials.
The GMC said Sir Roy failed in his duty as an expert witness and was wrong to compare the possibility of Mrs Clark's two children dying of natural causes to the odds of horses winning the Grand National.
Mrs Clark was found guilty in 1999 of murdering her sons Christopher and Harry but had her conviction quashed on appeal in 2003. Sir Roy also gave evidence in two other high-profile child trials in which mothers were wrongfully convicted. Angela Cannings and Donna Anthony were jailed for murdering their children but later cleared by the Court of Appeal.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments