Leading doctor calls for inquiry into NHS treatment of whistle-blowers
Heart surgeon who raised alarm about poor care was found to have been wrongly dismissed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The treatment of NHS whistle-blowers must be subject to a public inquiry, a leading doctor and patient safety pioneer has said, after a heart surgeon who raised the alarm about poor care was found to have been wrongly dismissed by his hospital.
Professor Sir Brian Jarman, the doctor who spearheaded the publication of hospital death rates, told The Independent that the time had come for the Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, to "put his money where his mouth is" and order a full inquiry in the wake of numerous accounts of NHS whistle-blowers being disciplined, or even dismissed by their employers after speaking out.
His intervention comes after a tribunal ruled on Wednesday that Dr Raj Mattu, a heart surgeon, was unfairly sacked by University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust in 2010, nine years after exposing the cases of two patients who died in crowded bays at the Walgrave Hospital in Coventry.
The tribunal ruled that Dr Mattu had been "subjected to many detriments by the Trust" because of his whistleblowing. The Trust ran up legal fees of £6m pursuing claims against him, and his solicitors said he had been "vilified, bullied and harassed out of a job he loved."
Professor Jarman, director of influential hospital data analyst the Dr Foster Unit, said the case proved that "something must be done" about the treatment of whistle-blowers in the NHS, for the good of patient safety.
"It's never really been properly solved. In the States you can get paid for whistleblowing. In the airline industry if you don't report a problem within a certain period of time you get into trouble, and if you do, you're considered to be doing a good thing," he said. "We've reached the point where we've got to have something done…one would prefer a public inquiry where witnesses can be subpoenaed and must give evidence on oath."
He added that all hospitals should appoint a board member responsible for whistle-blowing.
Mr Hunt has spoken out about the treatment of whistle-blowers in the NHS and recently wrote to all NHS trusts to remind them of their responsibility to allow staff to be honest and open about concerns over patient care.
A Department of Health spokesperson said Dr Mattu's case highlighted "the vital importance of openness".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments