Landmark hospital project led to rows, controversy and resignations

Tim Luckhurst
Monday 25 June 2001 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When the Government announced plans for a new Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh (RIE), it was hailed as a milestone on the exciting new road of public-private partnerships.

At an initial cost of £184m in August 1998, the Government promised that it would create "the largest new hospital to be built in Scotland in the 50-year history of the NHS".

The past three years, though, have proved contentious. The project has drawn fierce criticism from the British Medical Association (BMA), Unison, the Scottish National Party (SNP) and numerous rank and file members of the Scottish Labour Party, all concerned at the prospect of private industry making profits from the public purse. The BMA has calculated the real cost of the RIE at £720m over 25 years, and claims that the total cost would have been £180m if the project had been financed by a one-off payment from the public purse. Dr Brian Potter, the Scottish secretary of the BMA, even called for a moratorium on the scheme, insisting that it would saddle Scotland's Parliament with a 30-year debt.

The SNP has led public opposition to the sale of the original RIE site for £30m to a consortium including the Bank of Scotland, Taylor Woodrow Capital Development and Kilmartin Property Group. Alex Salmond, the former SNP leader, condemned the RIE project by claiming "private consortia are ripping off the public purse by using public assets for private profit".

In 1999, the SNP initiated a Scottish Parliament investigation into the RIE project, hoping to turn it into an important issue in the Scottish Parliamentary elections. At the same time Labour's Scottish treasurer, Bob Thomson, claimed the scheme was causing revolt within the party.However, the Scottish Executive remains committed to the scheme, insisting that it will deliver value for money despite continued rumblings in Labour Party ranks and bitter opposition from Unison.

Three private-sector companies, Balfour Beatty Construction, Morrison Construction and Haden Young, will replace the 119-year-old Edinburgh Royal Infirmary with a new facility at Little France in south-east Edinburgh.

The new RIE, boasting 869 beds and 24 operating theatres, will be completed in two phases; the first scheduled for completion in October with services for women and children opening next March. The final phase is due to open in the summer of 2003. It will be managed and administered for 30 years by Consort Health Care. All hospital ancillary staff will be transferred from NHS employment to a commercial company, Haden Health Care, which is part of the Consort group.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in