Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A licence to smoke cannabis legally was proposed today by one of Britain's leading experts on the drug.
Professor Roger Pertwee said making cannabis as available as alcohol would prevent drug-related crime, and reduce the chances of people being introduced to harder narcotics.
But he cautioned that it might be necessary to prevent vulnerable individuals obtaining the drug.
"You'd need to have a minimum age of 21, and I would suggest you might even have to have a licence," said Prof Pertwee, from the University of Aberdeen, who pioneered early research on the effects of cannabis in the 1960s and 1970s.
"You have a car licence and a dog licence; why not a cannabis licence?"
The idea would mean only those not suffering from a serious mental illness or at risk of psychosis would be legally allowed to buy the drug.
Research has shown an association between smoking cannabis and a greater chance of some individuals developing schizophrenia.
Prof Pertwee said cannabis appeared to increase the risk of psychosis in people already predisposed to the illness because of their genes or traumatic childhood.
He called for a greater debate on the recreational use of cannabis, and said in principle he was in favour of legalisation, if the right framework could be found.
"We need to explore all the various options," said Prof Pertwee, who is speaking at the British Festival of Science at Aston University, Birmingham, this week.
"At the moment cannabis is in the hands of the criminals, and I think it's crazy.
"We're allowed to drink alcohol and smoke cigarettes. Cannabis, if it's handled properly, I think is no more dangerous than that."
He pointed out that currently anyone wanting to take cannabis was forced to grow it illegally or buy it from illegal dealers.
The drug was supplied with no indication of what it contained, or what might have been added to it. People also tended to smoke cannabis in groups, which increased the likelihood of psychological dependency.
Licensed suppliers of the drug would also be less likely to provide a "gateway" to harder, more dangerous drugs.
"I think this could be the way forward, but it might not work," said Prof Pertwee. "It depends on a private company being willing to produce a branded product."
Prof Pertwee also highlighted the danger posed by new cannabis-like drugs being manufactured in laboratories.
Some acted in a similar way to cannabis but were far more potent, while potentially having other as-yet unknown effects.
An example of one such drug was the painkiller JWH-081, which had been developed purely for research purposes. The drug acts on the same cannabinoid receptors in the brain which are sensitive to the active ingredients in cannabis.
Anyone could find the recipes for making these drugs in the scientific literature, said Prof Pertwee.
"Any chemist could come along, read the paper, and make the compound," he added.
A loophole in the law opened the door to the drugs being used as "legal highs".
"It means you could buy these compounds and take them," said the professor. "I believe this is a major problem."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments