Infertile couples warned of 'useless' tests

Jeremy Laurance
Sunday 14 September 2003 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Infertile couples are being misled by some private clinics which offer useless tests to identify the source of their problem, the Royal College of Obstetricians says today.

In a warning to the tens of thousands of couples who seek treatment for infertility, the college says a number of screening tests developed in recent years and offered by clinics are "scientifically unsound".

Many of the tests are promoted on the internet and suggest that the failure to conceive children or experiencing repeated miscarriage may be caused by immunological abnormalities. A review by the college's scientific advisory committee has found that, with one exception, there is no good evidence that immunological abnormalities cause either infertility or miscarriage. The exception is antiphospholipid syndrome which is a recognised cause of miscarriage. It can be treated with aspirin or heparin, the college says.

Causes of infertility may lie with either the male or female partner but in 20 per cent of cases no explanation is found. Recurrent miscarriage may also be unexplained and affected couples often find the lack of explanation adds to their difficulties.

Professor Lesley Regan, who carried out the review, said: "It is clear that the advice given on many sites is strongly influenced by the personal prejudices of doctors practising non-evidence-based medicine."

A spokesman for Alan Beer, who runs clinics in California and London, said: "Dr Beer has been doing this for years and he totally disagrees with the report. He has had amazing success and hundreds of babies have been born as a result of his treatment."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in