High Court: GP exam for trainee doctors must not discriminate against minorities

 

Charlie Cooper
Thursday 10 April 2014 13:44 EDT
Comments
Pass rates for medical graduates trained overseas have been consistently much lower than for white UK graduates
Pass rates for medical graduates trained overseas have been consistently much lower than for white UK graduates (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A High Court judge has ruled that the exam trainee doctors must take to become a GP does not unlawfully discriminate against candidates from ethnic minorities.

The British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (Bapio) brought a judicial review against the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) over a segment of their exam in which candidates are assessed on their performance in a mock consultation with an actor playing the patient. The doctors’ regulator the General Medical Council was also included in the claim, which was wholly dismissed.

Pass rates for medical graduates trained overseas have been consistently much lower than for white UK graduates, who also have higher pass rates than black and Asian doctors trained in the UK.

Mr Justice Mitting ruled that the exam was a “proportional” way to assess candidates, but said the claim had been brought in “good faith” and that Bapio had won “if not a legal success, then a moral success”. He said “the time has come” for the RCGP to address the issue, Pulse magazine reported.

Chair of the RCGP Maureen Baker said: “The RCGP has been at the forefront of identifying the differences in pass rates for some time…We have always been, and remain, concerned by this issue, and are determined to continue to work with all other interested stakeholders in both understanding it, and looking to remedy it.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in