High cost of private finance in hospitals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The cost of building hospitals with private finance can be almost double that of publicly funded schemes, according to a study in today's British Medical Journal.
The Government insists that the private finance initiative (PFI), where a private sector consortium designs, builds, finances and operates a new hospital, delivers value for money.
But new research led by Professor Allyson Pollock of University College London says that NHS trusts incur much higher costs through the PFI scheme. NHS trusts pay an annual fee to cover the cost of the capital borrowed, maintenance and non-clinical services. But analysis by Prof Pollock of PFI schemes at Worcester, North Durham and Carlisle shows the annual bill for a PFI scheme is "almost double" or one third more than a public scheme.
At Worcester, the annual cost of the PFI is £9.3m compared with £6.8m for public funding; for Carlisle the PFI bill is £9m a year compared with £5.9m, and North Durham has to spend £11.3m as opposed to £6.4m.
Prof Pollock said that the Government's case for using PFI rests on a value for money assessment that is "skewed in favour of private finance".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments