Health Update: Not-so-heavy metal

Cherrill Hicks
Monday 19 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

HEAVY METAL is less harmful to the ears than some orchestral compositions, according to researchers from the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham. They studied the hearing of members of ManOWar, billed as the loudest rock band in the world, whose PA system can produce noise levels in excess of 135 decibels.

None of the band showed any symptoms of permanent ear problems, although after playing they did suffer feelings of blockage and ringing in the ears which had usually disappeared by the next morning.

The effects of classical music may be worse: in one study of the City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra 20 per cent of the players had slight hearing defects. Another study of musicians with the Royal Danish Theatre indicated that the problem is particularly acute in the left ears of violinists.

The authors of the report in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine point out that the most damaging sound is 'high impulse noise', not often found in pop music. While there is a small risk of damage in rock musicians, the risk to audiences is probably much less than is usually thought and generally temporary, they argue.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in