Drug shown to slow Parkinson's disease

Health Editor,Jeremy Laurance
Wednesday 23 September 2009 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Doctors treating 120,000 sufferers of Parkinson's disease in Britain may have to change their approach after researchers identified the first drug shown to slow progress of the disease.

One of the world's largest studies of the condition, involving 1,176 patients with early stage Parkinson's in 14 countries including the UK, showed that the drug rasagiline delayed neurological deterioration. Rasagiline, whose brand name is Azilect, is already used to treat the symptoms of Parkinson's but doctors have been reluctant to prescribe it in the early stages of the disease, fearing the effects will wear off.

Research by the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, suggests that its early prescription may be the best way to delay progress of the disease. Researchers found that after 18 months, patients who had received early treatment with 1mg of the drug daily had not deteriorated as much as those in whom treatment was delayed by nine months. The difference was small, they said, but clinically significant.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in