Donors set to be laughing all the way to sperm bank

Health Editor,Jeremy Laurance
Sunday 16 January 2011 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Hundreds of pounds could be offered to people willing to donate sperm or eggs to infertile couples, under proposals launched today.

Just five years after its last review of the rules on donation of gametes, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) is seeking views on whether payments should be sharply increased.

A ban on forms of donation within the family, such as between brothers and sisters, and stricter guidlines on handling familial donations, such as between sisters, is also being considered. Demand for fertility treatment is increasing and the shortage of sperm and eggs has worsened since donor anonymity was removed in 2005. The use of donated gametes is controversial, occupying 80 per cent of the time of the HFEA, despite accounting for only 12 per cent of in vitro fertilisation.

Launching the review, Lisa Jardine, chair of the HFEA, cited a recent cover of the New York Times Review which showed three women, one man and two babies described as "twiblings" – an infertile couple with their two surrogate mothers who had carried babies simultaneously using donor eggs.

Exisiting rules limit compensation for egg donors to expenses and lost earnings up to a maximum of £250, with less for sperm donors.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in