Doctors fear reporting colleagues

Health Editor,Jeremy Laurance
Monday 07 March 2011 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

About one in five doctors has had experience of an incompetent or poorly performing colleague within the past three years, a study has found.

But one-third of those questioned said they had failed to report the colleague to the relevant authority, leaving patients at risk. The survey of 1,000 doctors in general practice and hospital medicine in the UK compared their experience with 2,000 doctors in the United States.

Where doctors had not reported a colleague, the most common reason in Britain was that they were afraid of retribution, reflecting the unsympathetic treatment of whistleblowers. A recent British Medical Association survey found that 16 per cent of doctors who had reported a concern about a staff member faced a warning that it would affect their employment.

The most common action by US doctors was to stop referring patients to the colleague – an option not open to British GPs, who mostly refer to a hospital department rather than to a specific doctor.

One in five doctors in both countries disagreed that they should put patients' welfare above their financial interests.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in