Court fight over future of children's heart surgery
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A key milestone in the struggle to reshape the National Health Service is reached today as two NHS organisations square up in court over the future of children's heart surgery in London.
One in five NHS trusts is struggling to survive in the tough economic climate and the National Audit Office concluded last October that there were too many hospitals in the wrong places with the wrong specialties serving the wrong populations.
The first specialty to confront the challenge is children's heart surgery, which has spent a decade negotiating a plan, published last year, to concentrate services in fewer, larger centres to raise standards and improve safety, as well as save money. It followed a public inquiry into the worst hospital scandal of the 1990s in which scores of babies died or were maimed by sub-standard treatment in Bristol.
In London, served by three units, the plan was to close paediatric heart surgery at the Royal Brompton Hospital in Chelsea and concentrate the service at Great Ormond Street Hospital and Guy's and St Thomas's.
But it was blocked by the Royal Brompton which called the idea an "act of bureaucratic vandalism" and won a court order in November halting the move. The Safe and Sustainable NHS review, run by a joint committee representing primary care trusts, which drew up the plan, will today appeal against last November's ruling.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments