Cancer charity rebuffs 'evidence' of tumours caused by mobiles
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.By Jane Hughes
By Jane Hughes
17 October 1999
THE DIRECTOR of Britain's leading cancer charity spoke out yesterday to allay fresh fears that mobile phones can cause brain tumours.
Professor Gordon McVie, of the Cancer Research Campaign, said he was unconvinced by the claims of Dr George Carlo, an American expert who claims to have found new evidence of the link between mobile phone usage and brain cancer.
Professor McVie said there was no "conclusive evidence to prove that mobile phones are likely to increase the risk of cancer" and that the charity was waiting for the Department of Health to report on an official British study on mobile phone safety, due in November.
Dr Carlo, a public health scientist based in Washington, was funded to the tune of £15m by mobile phone companies to carry out research into the health risks posed by mobile phones. A staunch industry spokesman until recently, Dr Carlo has written to the heads of the companies to express his frustration at their lack of action since he drew attention, in February, to the high incidence of brain cancer in mobile phone users.
The new government working party set up to investigate the effects that mobile phones have on human health has asked Dr Carlo for more information. However, the chairman of the Commons select committee on science and technology, Dr Michael Clark, criticised Dr Carlo last night for "circulating scare stories".
"It is irresponsible for Dr Carlo to publish his concerns in this way," he said. "His letter doesn't give any figures or convincing proof. He should ask for his evidence to be checked by at least two other independent scientific bodies before publicising it."
Last month the all-party select committee announced that mobile telephones and cellphone masts do not pose a threat to health, but Dr Clark also called for more scrutiny by the Government of research carried out by the industry.
Gerard Hyland, a physicist at the University of Warwick, has also maintained that the signal from digital mobile phones can have an adverse effect on neurological function. No other scientists have been able to support his claims.
But the first comprehensive study of research carried out by scientists from the Institute for Satellite and Mobile Communication showed, earlier this month, that some models of mobile phone expose users to up to 20 times more radiation than others on the market.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments