Busy surgeons have the best patient survival rates
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Patients are more likely to survive heart and cancer operations if the knife is wielded by a busy surgeon.
A study in the United States of 474,000 patients showed that surgeons who did 100 coronary artery bypasses a year had a death rate 36 per cent higher than that of busy surgeons, who performed more than 162 operations a year.
For pancreatic cancer, surgeons who did fewer than two operations a year had a death rate 260 per cent higher than those who did more than four a year.
Bruce Keogh, a cardiac surgeon at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, said the findings, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, would increase pressure for individual details of surgeons' performance to be published.
"I think it is perfectly reasonable for patients to ask surgeons about their record. Most know their results and aren't embarrassed to tell them. Patients have to trust their surgeons," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments